Loopy Seeds

The decision to trim cannabis wet or dry depends on your goals, preferences, and the environmental conditions during harvest. Here’s a breakdown of the pros and cons of each method to help you decide:

Wet Trimming

Wet trimming involves cutting off fan leaves and sugar leaves immediately after harvesting, while the plant is still fresh and moist.

Pros:
• Easier to Trim: Leaves are rigid and easier to handle when wet, allowing for faster trimming.
• Prevents Mold: Removing excess moisture-holding foliage reduces the risk of mold during drying, especially in humid climates.
• Quicker Drying: Trimmed buds dry faster, reducing the drying time by a few days.
• Neat Appearance: Wet trimming often results in neatly manicured buds.

Cons:
• Faster Drying Risks: Buds may dry too quickly, potentially locking in chlorophyll and affecting flavor.
• Sticky Work: Fresh resin can stick to tools and hands, making trimming messier.
• Loss of Terpenes: Faster drying can result in some terpene loss due to evaporation.

Dry Trimming

Dry trimming is done after the plant has been dried with leaves intact, typically hung upside down to dry first.

Pros:
• Better Flavor and Aroma: Slower drying with leaves intact allows for more gradual moisture release, preserving terpenes and enhancing flavor.
• Easier on Terpenes: Dry trimming reduces the risk of terpene evaporation during drying.
• Less Sticky: Dried resin is less sticky, making trimming less messy.
• Ideal for Large Harvests: Drying whole plants is practical when processing large quantities.

Cons:
• Harder to Trim: Leaves become brittle and curl into the buds, making trimming more time-consuming and labor-intensive.
• Mold Risk: In humid environments, drying with leaves intact can increase the risk of mold or bud rot.
• More Space Needed: Hanging full plants for drying requires more space compared to trimmed buds.

Key Considerations
1. Climate: In humid environments, wet trimming may be better to avoid mold. In dry climates, dry trimming helps retain moisture during drying.
2. Scale of Harvest: Wet trimming works well for small harvests, while dry trimming is often preferred for larger batches.
3. Flavor and Quality: If preserving terpene profiles and enhancing flavors is a priority, dry trimming is generally recommended.
4. Time and Efficiency: Wet trimming is faster if you want to process and dry buds quickly.

Hybrid Approach:
Some growers use a hybrid method, removing large fan leaves wet and leaving sugar leaves to dry for a day or two before trimming. This balances efficiency with quality preservation.

Which method aligns best with your goals?

Here’s a breakdown of LED vs. HPS (High-Pressure Sodium) grow lights :

PAR Rating (Photosynthetically Active Radiation)
• LEDs:
• Typically have a higher PAR efficiency, meaning they deliver more usable light per watt to plants.
• Can be fine-tuned to provide a spectrum closer to plants’ needs, improving light use efficiency.
• HPS:
• Lower PAR efficiency compared to LEDs. A significant portion of the energy goes to heat instead of usable light for photosynthesis.
• Good for general plant growth but less targeted.

Cost to Run Ratio
• LEDs:
• Higher initial cost but much lower operational costs due to energy efficiency (30-50% savings compared to HPS).
• Longer lifespan (50,000+ hours vs. ~24,000 for HPS), reducing replacement costs over time.
• HPS:
• Lower upfront cost but significantly higher energy consumption.
• Generates more heat, requiring additional cooling equipment, which increases running costs.

Light Spectrum
• LEDs:
• Can be customized to provide a full-spectrum light, including red, blue, white, and even UV/IR.
• Often designed to optimize the specific wavelengths most beneficial for plant growth (e.g., chlorophyll absorption peaks).
• Some models allow spectrum adjustment based on growth stage.
• HPS:
• Emits light heavily skewed towards the yellow/red spectrum, which is good for flowering and fruiting stages but less ideal for vegetative growth.
• Lacks the full spectrum needed for optimal plant health across all stages.

UV Supplement
• LEDs:
• Many modern LED grow lights include UV and IR diodes, providing supplemental light without additional equipment.
• UV light can promote secondary metabolite production (e.g., cannabinoids, flavonoids) in certain plants.
• LEDs allow for targeted UV application without excessive heat.
• HPS:
• No natural UV light emission. Requires separate UV supplements if UV exposure is needed.
• Adding UV with HPS systems can be challenging due to the high heat output of both light types.

Summary
• LEDs:
• Best for long-term efficiency, full-spectrum growth, and tailored lighting needs.
• Higher upfront cost but pays off in lower operational costs and better plant performance.
• HPS:
• More affordable upfront but less energy-efficient and less versatile.
• Suitable for budget growers but requires careful heat management and additional spectrum supplementation.

Getting this E-commerce site up and running has been an adventure!
Hopefully soon I have a real payment processor.
I have applied with several and hope to partner with the best fit for you and I soon.

A wise man knows his limitations. A successful man ignores the wise man.